Daily Bonnie Combs


This website is a collection of screen caps, stories, emails, pictures and other evidence that proves Bonnie Combs aka Christine Armstrong, Chretienne Ouelette, Jamie Vaughn, Lady / Pixie Maguire (June 14, 1980) from Tulsa, Oklahoma does not have a clean slate and is not who she claims to be online.

The content on this weblog is the opinion of it’s owner only and not necessarily fact. Said content will not be altered, removed or password protected for any reason whatsoever.

/


Other Locations:

Wordpress
Blogspot #1
Tumblr #1
Blogspot #2
ED Page
Twitter
Flickr Album
Photobucket Album

Noteworthy Entries:

  • Bonnie Combs - Twitter Threats & Defamation
  • Bonnie Combs Goes off the Rails on Twitter
  • Bonnie Combs - Exposed & Humiliated on Twitter
  • Bonnie Combs is a Sad and Pathetic Liar (Stolen Photos)
  • Bonnie Combs Threatens to Murder Krystal AGAIN!!!
  • More Proof
  • Bonnie Combs IS Chretienne Ouelette / Jamie Vaughn / Pixie Maguire / Christine Armstrong
  • Bonnie Combs - Psychotic Twitter Behaviour
  • Bonnie Combs Visited by the Tulsa Police 02/12/2013
  • Deletion of BonnieCombs.com
  • Bonnie Combs - Tulsa, Oklahoma - Impersonating an Employee of OSU (Oklahoma State University - Centre for Health Sciences)
  • Thousands of Accounts - Here's Just the Tip of the Icecap
  • Why This Website Exists
  • Bonnie Combs Impersonating her Relative Misty Combs: EXPOSED!
  • Bonnie M. Combs Impersonating Misty Combs!
  • Bonnie Combs - Tulsa Terrorist and Psychopath - Lives at 2337 w 47th street in Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Bonnie Combs - IP and ISP Information
  • Bonnie Combs - Proof - Round One
  • Bonnie Combs - Proof - Round Two
  • Liespotting - An Art within a Science

    A few thoughts…

    I’d like the record to reflect that the Daily Krystal blog uses material taken from THIS blog. How’s that for originality? Block us from your sites and then visit ours. That’s not weird at all.

    Getting screenshots of a private website, whether it be twitter, facebook, livejournal, e-mail or another website, while blocking people from your own blog, is rather hypocritical. While you’re spraying the “hypocrite spray” make sure you cover yourself generously.

    image

    A few points…

    • We do not hunt for information about Bonnie Combs AT ALL.
    • We do not troll external websites asking for random people to contact us.
    • We do not initiate e-mail conversations with anyone.
    • We put our contact information on this blog ONLY. When we ask someone to e-mail us, it has not been to ask for more details or information.


    Many people have come to us with their real stories about what an awful person Bonnie Combs really is whereas Bonnie has to create fictional stories based on lies and defamation about her victims because they are completely innocent in this matter. Katy, Krystal, Kristy, etc… (Bonnie clearly has a thing for women with K names…) are innocent and nothing more than victims of Bonnie’s (and co) malicious cyberbullying, lies and impersonation.

    The latest attempts to question the motives of this blog just goes to show that someone, somewhere is threatened by my presence. I wonder who that could be? Who could possibly feel threatened by Bonnie Combs true self being publicly exposed? And why is it a bad thing for people to question what Bonnie Combs says on her several hundred hate blogs? Why must any and all voices of opposition be silenced?

    A few things to note…

    • Liars tell stories in strict chronology.
    • Liars will repeat a question verbatim.
    • Liars won’t use contractions in their denials.
    • Liars avoid or confuse pronouns.
    • Liars hedge their statements.


    Sound like anyone you know? *Wink*

    Don’t Move… or I’ll shoot!

    That is the kind of threat that will make us stop what we’re doing here. We would take notice of a threat like that. We’d be as still as a statue. Somehow we doubt a threat like that will ever happen though.

    Bonnie really wants this blog to be taken down. IT’S NOT GOING ANYWHERE. How many different ways can we say that?

    • 7 September 2013